AI Ships More Code. SRE Pays the Price.

AI coding tools are accelerating development velocity. Downstream teams — SRE, platform, on-call — haven't scaled with that throughput. This report maps the widening capacity gap with data from LinearB, GitClear, and Google's DORA research, and lays out three paths forward.

41%
Capacity gap by 2027
2X
Code churn increase since 2021
-60%
Decline in refactoring activity
01 string
02 string
03 enum
04 string?

What's in the Report

  1. The Data How AI coding tools are accelerating code velocity, with benchmarks from LinearB (6.1M PRs), GitClear (211M lines), and Google DORA
  2. The Quality Problem Why speed without discipline compounds technical debt: code churn up 2×, refactoring down 60%, system stability declining
  3. The Capacity Gap Code output vs. SRE headcount from 2021 through 2027, and why the gap compounds every year
  4. Three Paths Forward Scale ops capacity, constrain change, or scale operations with AI — and how to decide which fits
  5. A Diagnostic Question A simple frame to know whether this is already costing your team

"When incidents pile up, roadmap progress stops and people burn out."

— Director of SRE, Enterprise CX Company

Trusted by engineering teams at leading companies

Databricks
Anyscale
LlamaIndex
DataHub
Corelight
Snorkel
Monte Carlo
MotherDuck
Embrace
Eppo
Arize
DSPy